Showing posts with label forgiveness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forgiveness. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2020

More on Forgiveness and Clergy Abuse Situation: Kaya Oakes on Need for New Understandings


A month ago, Ruth Krall offered us a valuable statement about the "sin or crime" dilemma facing religious bodies as they deal with sexual abuse of vulnerable people by religious authority figures. Should a community frame sexual abuse of the vulnerable by pastors, priests, religious authority figures primarily in terms of forgiveness? Or should religious communities begin from the starting point of recognizing that sexual abuse of minors is a crime, as they deal with these issues?

Monday, February 10, 2020

The Holocaust and Christian Theologies of Sin and Forgiveness: Imperative Need for Christians to Listen to Jews

Elizabeth Johnson, The Quest for the Living God (London: Bloomsbury, 2007)

Ruth Krall's recent sounding of various ecclesial responses to the sexual abuse of minors and how they raise profound questions about theologies of sin and forgiveness has made me think about the valuable contribution of Jewish thinkers to Christian theological reflection about these matters. Ruth's essay includes a paragraph surveying some Jewish thinkers on the topic of sin and forgiveness.

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Ruth Krall, "A Sin or a Crime?"

David Stoltzfus Smucker (age 75) wheeled into court in Lancaster, PA, Pittsburg Post-Gazette, 24 Jan. 2020

I'm happy to share today a recent essay by Ruth Krall that packs a lot of valuable information and theological reflection into a small space. Though it's specifically focused on questions about how abuse of vulnerable people is handled in her own religious community of origin, it offers a valuable lens through with those studying abuse in other religious or institutional settings can also look. Ruth writes:

Sentence: 38-76 years of imprisonment: This means that Smucker will likely die in jail.  The crime: 20 felony counts for sexually molesting children, i.e., rape, of his grandchildren.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness, Part Two — Speaking Truthfully" (2)

Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

The posting that follows is the second half of Ruth Krall's essay "Bearing Witness, Part Two — Speaking Truthfully." The first part of this essay is here. As that previous posting indicates, this is the fourth in a set of essays Ruth has published discussing what it means to bear witness as one engages in the work of compassionate peacemaking. In this second half of her essay about speaking truthfully as one bears witness, she probes questions about how clinicians and others both safeguard the privacy and integrity of those who have entrusted their stories to them, and, at the same time, handle the professional and moral obligation to prevent harm. Ruth's essay follows:

Monday, January 13, 2020

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness, Part Two — Speaking Truthfully"

Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

With this posting, we're nearing the end of Ruth Krall's invaluable, thought-provoking essay series entitled "Compassionate Peacemaking: Healing the World's Wounds One at a Time," with the first part of the series comprised of four essays under the title "Part One: Bearing Witness." This is the fourth essay in the "Bearing Witness" set of essays, and is entitled "Bearing Witness, Part Two —Speaking Truthfully."

I'm posting this final essay in Ruth's essay series in two pieces. The first half of "Bearing Witness, Part Two — Speaking Truthfully." Endnotes begin with xliii because this essay is a continuation of previous essays in the series, the previous one in the series being here and here. Ruth's essay follows:

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness: Part One — Paying Attention" (2)

Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

The following posting is a continuation of Ruth Krall's essay "Bearing Witness: Part One — Paying Attention." The first half of this essay appeared in this previous posting. As that posting and others preceding it have noted, this essay is one in a series of essays Ruth has entitled "Compassionate Peacemaking: Healing the World's Wounds One at a Time." Clicking from one preceding essay to the next will show you the entire series posted on Bilgrimage thus far. 

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness: Part One — Paying Attention"

 Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

This is the third essay in Ruth Krall's series of essays entitled "Compassionate Peacemaking: Healing the World's Wounds One at a Time." It argues persuasively for an understanding of faithful witness that is based on being fully present inside our life situation and carefully observant of our surroundings. Because this essay is rather long and rich, I'm going to post it in two pieces. What follows is the first half of the essay, whose title is "Bearing Witness: Part One — Paying Attention." (Note numbers begin at xxix because this essay is a continuation of two that preceded it.)

Saturday, December 21, 2019

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness: The First Step in Reconciliation" (2)

Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

The essay below is the second half of Ruth Krall's essay "Bearing Witness: The First Step in Reconciliation." The first half of this essay is here. This essay is one in a series of essays by Ruth Krall entitled "Compassionate Peacemaking: Healing the World's Wounds One at a Time." Part one of the series, which has the series title "Bearing Witness," consists of four essays. When I introduced you to this series of essays (see the preceding link), I noted that they seem to me very important statements for those who observe the Christian liturgical season of Advent.

In this essay, Ruth writes, "To accept the mission of reconciliation as our vocation means stepping into the politicized position of the margins rather than the more imposing and secure position inside the centers of power." And what does this statement mean, if it does not sum up the logic of God's choice to take flesh in Jesus: what Ruth says about the mission of reconciliation is in key respects a summary of the gospel stories about the birth of Christ. Ruth's essay follows:

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Ruth Krall, "Bearing Witness: The First Step in Reconciliation"

Vincent van Gogh, "The Good Samaritan," original in the Kroller-Muller Museum in Otterlo, The Netherlands, uploaded to Wikimedia Commons for online sharing.

As my previous posting stated, I'm privileged to offer another set of essays by Ruth Krall, entitled "Compassionate Peacemaking: Healing the World's Wounds One at a Time." Part one of the series, which has the series title "Bearing Witness," consists of four essays. The essay you'll find below is the first part of Ruth's second essay in the "Bearing Witness" series, entitled "Bearing Witness: The First Step in Reconciliation." The second half of the essay will appear in a day or so after this.

As Ruth's footnote appended to the title of this essay states, she first presented this essay as an invited faculty presentation at the annual faculty retreat of her alma mater Goshen College in 2001. Please note that the footnotes to this essay begin with the number vi because the number sequence begins where notes in the previous essay ended. The first part of Ruth's essay "Bearing Witness: The First Step in Reconciliation" follows. Ruth has dedicated this essay series to her friend and mentor Nelle Morton.

Monday, January 29, 2018

Frank Schaeffer on Why White Evangelicals Love Trump: "The Context Is American Racism" — Implications for White Catholic "Pro-Life" Voters



This is the kind of testimony that white Catholics who claim to be motivated solely by opposition to abortion as they cast their votes do not want to hear. I wonder why?

Friday, January 12, 2018

Standing Ovation at Highpoint Church, Memphis, for Pastor Who Sexually Assaulted 17-Year-Old Girl: Churches Still Not Intending to Get It


A week ago, Jules Woodson told a painful story of her sexual assault by youth pastor Andy Savage at Woodlands Parkway Baptist church in Houston. She was 17 years old when he drove her to a secluded place, unzipped his pants, pulled out his penis and asked her to suck it, and unbuttoned her shirt and fondled her breasts. As her account states, after this occurred, she notified church leaders about what had happened and met a stone wall until she told an all-women's discipleship group at her church what had happened.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

SNAP on Premature Forgiveness and Harm It Does to Abuse Survivors: The Need for a Moratorium on Forgiveness Talk in Clergy Abuse Cases



Today, I'd like to share with you a statement from Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), which appeared a few days ago at Marci Hamilton's blog, Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. It's an appeal for religious leaders to place a year's moratorium on talk about forgiveness in clergy abuse cases.

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Quote for Today: "The Sort of Bland Saluting of Forgiveness with Nothing Else Attached Is Empty"



And on the ways in which forgiveness (about which I posted yesterday) in the wake of an atrocity like the Mother Emanuel shootings can be a trap, a convenient cover for the refusal of those with power in their hands to do anything to change the conditions that produce such atrocities, there are powerful, fascinating, necessary conversations right now at Twitter. Here's a sampler of comments worth noting, which point out that there's a sentimental trope in American literature about master-slave relationships which exalts the forgiving nature of the slave, and that white Americans frequently co-opt the willingness of black Christians to forgive as a way of refusing to face the injustice of racism:

Saturday, June 20, 2015

"I Forgive You": Grieving Family Members of Charleston Church Shooting Speak to Dylann Storm Roof


"I forgive you," Nadine Collier said through tears to the accused killer of her mother, Ethel Lance. "You took something very precious away from me. I will never get to talk to her ever again. I will never be able to hold her again, but I forgive you, and have mercy on your soul" (Michael Daly, Daily Beast).

Monday, August 18, 2008

There's Forgiveness, and Then There's Forgiveness

This is not a particularly good time for me. Not complaining. Just explaining.

Explaining why I’m slow to blog, and why what I have to say today may be even less inspiring than usual.

There’s the aftermath of the funeral, the process of grief (which demands energy and readiness to go with the flow when it strikes): and in my case, all of this is more vicarious than otherwise, since I am living through this with Steve, who had not yet lost a parent. Having lost both of mine, I have an inkling of how it feels, though no one ever knows from the inside the pain of someone else.

There are also the end-of-summer blahs, which are especially trying for someone who hates hot weather, but who lives in Cairo with humidity. The last weeks of August, it sometimes feels as if summer won’t end, that we won’t have those crisp blasts of dry, cool air down across the plains, the spiraling leaves of oak and sweetgum, hickory and dogwood, with their resplendent autumn colors.

Most of all, though, there are the churches. I am, frankly, fed up. I could spend today’s blog commenting on the McCain-Obama debate at Rick Warren’s megachurch the other evening. But I won’t.

I won’t because I refused to watch it. I won’t because it strikes me as the grimmest possible commentary on our political process that we entrust the kingmaker’s role to a megachurch preacher.

I certainly understand all the reasons a presidential candidate absolutely has to court the evangelical vote, in this nation with the soul of a church. But that doesn’t mean I have to allow the influence of those kingmakers into my own heart and soul. They have enough influence on my life already, insofar as they wield great power in the decision-making process by which our culture chooses how to treat gay human beings.

My life is determined by the Rick Warrens of the world. And I’m not happy about that.

Nor am I surprised at all to discover today that, even as Rick Warren was reassuring his audience during the debate that Mr. McCain was in a “cone of silence,” this was not, in fact, true. And Rick Warren knew this, even as he spoke to his audience about the cone of silence.

Rick Warren lied, in other words. And I’m not surprised. I’m surprised only that some Americans still find it possible to be surprised that leaders of the religious right, whether in its draconian old incarnation or its kinder, gentler new one, will openly lie. And expect us all to forgive and forget.

Ask any garden-variety LGBT person in America if church leaders are willing to lie to us. And about us. All of them. I think you’ll get an earful.

We’re used to being lied to and lied about—which is to say, used to the assumption of a large number of church leaders and members that they have no obligation to treat us as anything but garbage. And we’re used to being lectured about our anger, and preached to about the need to forgive, as our faces are ground into the mud by folks holding bibles and crucifixes.

Lately, the forgiveness message is sticking in my craw, and I can’t get it out. I can’t work out what I really feel about that message: what my soul is saying to me beyond all the beguiling voices that are so quick to talk about forgiveness from within the church context.

On the one hand, I know that forgiveness is the substance of spiritual life, whether one is Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, a practitioner of native religions, or whatever. From a Christian standpoint, the obligation is always there: 70 x 70; forgive us as we forgive those who trespass against us. It is an obligation that never ends, and the challenge to forgive engages us to the moment of our last breath.

Even so, I have come to think that there’s forgiveness and there’s forgiveness. There’s the forgiveness that the mighty, the rapacious, the cruel of the earth expect everyone else to practice, since it lets them off the hook. There’s the forgiveness that enables injustice and cruelty.

There’s the forgiveness that’s precipitous, since those engaging in cruelty and injustice demand it of us without confronting, acknowledging, and mending the effects of their cruelty and injustice. There’s the forgiveness that glosses over all injustice in the world.

And I find it rather hard to believe this is what Jesus means, when he calls us to forgiveness.

I’ve thought through these questions using the lens of the sexual abuse crisis in the Catholic church. I have not been sexually abused by any cleric. I have, however, been abused by clerics and religious—as a gay person, as a lay person, as a theologian, as an employee in church-owned institutions. I cannot know what it is like to endure sexual abuse by a trusted religious authority figure when one is young. I can barely begin to imagine the horror of such an experience, the inroads it must make into the psyche.

I cannot and should not presume to extrapolate from my own experiences of being abused by clerics and religious, to the claim that I know what a survivor of clerical sexual abuse feels. I don’t. I can’t.

Even so, I can understand enough about what any form of unmerited abuse must feel like—based on my own experiences of such abuse—to seek solidarity with those who are experiencing or have experienced abuse. Ever since the abuse crisis “broke” in the Catholic church, I have sought solidarity with the community of survivors.

For a number of years, I actively participated in the ongoing forum about these issues at the website of the Survivors Network of Abuse by Priests (SNAP). I eventually stopped taking part in that forum, since I came to believe I had had my say there, and needed to find other forums in which to keep talking about these significant theological issues.

But my solidarity with survivors remains as strong as ever, as does my commitment to do anything I can to challenge the churches—and my own church, the Catholic church, in particular—to try to assure that no minor is ever again abused by a cleric or religious. I owe much to survivors who have shared their stories with me, both on the SNAP website and in other contexts. I have learned much from survivors and the dialogue with them. I continue to do so.

I stand in solidarity with survivors who actively resist—who repudiate—the message of church leaders to them to forgive and forget. Before the church leaders have acknowledged what they have done. Before they admit that many priests have sexually abused minors, that bishops on the whole covered up this abuse and used money and legal threats to silence survivors, that bishops have lied about what they knew when, that bishops are still playing legal games to hide the extent of what has gone on. And that the Vatican knew and colluded as well.

Like survivors of clerical sexual abuse, I have come to a point in my life when it is actively painful for me to go to church. I went to Steve’s father’s funeral because, well, what else could or should I have done? If one cannot endure a trifling few moments of pain on behalf of those one loves, what is love about?

That doesn’t mean I was content with being in church, with participating in rituals and partaking of words that no longer have the same meaning for me that they once did, after I discovered the glib abandon with which church people can treat me as an openly gay believer. I was surely unhappy to sit in the church and see some of the hateful glances—the sneers, the whispers—all from “straight” men, directed at me, even as these men digested the Eucharist they had just received.

I feel I have had all I can take of this. And I don’t know how to forgive. I don’t know how to forgive, because I don’t see any of the folks who inhabit the churches and feel free to vent hate right within their sacred spaces changing anytime soon. In such a context, my forgiveness—as a formal act—would only enable and deepen the abuse the churches practice towards gay human beings.

As I have said in my reflections on Steve’s father’s funeral, I do think change will eventually come, as people of faith, courage, and compassion such as his father live beyond and around the walls by which we gay brothers and sisters find ourselves shut out. But that’s a process that is going to take time, and there’s a meantime.

For us who are gay, the meantime is the time in which we are living now, trying to nourish within ourselves the flame of hope and love, while the churches do everything in their power to extinguish that flame on a daily basis. The meantime is our lives. We are given only one life.

Concretely, many of us are faced with the challenge of either forgiving daily and submitting ourselves to grueling experiences every time we encounter “Christians,” or simply chucking it all and looking for a spiritual life somewhere else. We need spirituality, all of us. Most of us who are gay feel that need as acutely as anyone else does.

We need community. We actively seek it.

And the churches aren’t in the business of offering either community or spirituality to us, at the moment we need it: in our own lifetimes, in the meantime in which we are living now. Instead, in my case, there has been the exceedingly painful abuse again and again of working for church-sponsored institutions, only to find myself lied to and about, and then expelled in ugly rituals of abuse.

Since the funeral, some of those wounds have been rubbed raw by the experience of grief, the struggle to live through the aftermath of loss. The memories of those who engaged in this ugly behavior are, these days, fresh, as when a scab is suddenly pulled from a wound and the wound bleeds.

And I write all this against the backdrop of the recent shooting of the Democratic party chair in Little Rock—an event still murky. Bill Gwatney's funeral is today. Fred Phelps and his crew will be there. It’s just up the street from me. They’re jubilant that their God has shot down another Democrat. Their website statement about the shooting, to which the Arkansas Times blog has linked today, is obscene.

And, though many church folks profess to deplore the Phelpses of the world, is their ultimate position regarding me and my life, my brothers and sisters and their lives, all that different from the position of the Phelps family—in its effect on us? And in what they actually believe and say about us? And how they treat us?