Showing posts with label Baptists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baptists. Show all posts

Saturday, August 17, 2019

"Ladies, You'll Never Have to Use a Washing Machine Again When You Get to Heaven": I Report on a Funeral Sermon

Maytag Ad 1959

"Ladies, just think! You'll never have to use a washing machine again when you get to heaven."

Then the preacher sidled his head around and gave an impossibly cute look-at-me grin to the "ladies" in the church, which was designed to communicate that he thought he was the niftiest thing since sliced bread, and quite the lady-killer.

Monday, December 10, 2018

Abuse of Vulnerable People and Churches: Recent Reports, from Baptists to Nuns Raped by Bishops and Priests to Jesuits to a German Princess Saving the Church



This is a collection of reports on the abuse situation as it is unfolding in various churches now. These are all recent statements, and not by any means a representative report on all that is happening on the sexual abuse front in religious groups right now. Stories are breaking on that front fast and furious — this is only my own selection of reports that have drawn my attention recently, for reasons that will be apparent as you read:

Monday, November 19, 2018

Saturday, February 24, 2018

As Neo-Nazis Celebrate Murder of Gay Jewish College Student, Where Are the Churches? (When They're Not Firing Queer Employees and Supporting Anti-Queer Discrimination, That Is)


In an article entitled "Inside Atomwaffen As It Celebrates a Member for Allegedly Killing a Gay Jewish College Student," A.C. Thompson, Ali Winston, and Jake Hanrahan report on behalf of ProPublica:

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Two More Queer Catholics Fired, "Progressive" Evangelicals "Discern" Whether Queer Folks Should Be Treated Equally, CBF Discriminates Against Queer Employees: What's This All About?




"In early December 2017, a representative from the Archdiocese of Edmonton called me in for an investigation."

And we can stop Mark's painful testimony right there, at the opening line, can't we? Because we already see where this story of the firing of yet another LGBTQ employee of a Catholic institution — he was pastoral associate of a parish in Alberta, Canada — is going.

Sunday, February 11, 2018

Two More Resources re: Non-LGBTQ-Affirming Policy of Cooperative Baptist Fellowship and Shane Claiborne's Refusal, as a "Progressive Evangelical," to Affirm Queer Folks Unambiguously


 

Two items I'd like to share with you today as a follow-up to yesterday's posting noting what's now happening in the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, as the church creates a two-tiered structure for its employees that allows rights and privileges to straight folks denied to queer ones. In addition, my posting yesterday focused on the controversy that has ensued after Shane Claiborne, a "progressive evangelical" who refuses to affirm LGBTQ people unambiguously, announced that he and his Red Letter Christians will be sponsoring a revival of "progressive evangelicals in Lynchburg, Virginia, in April.

Saturday, February 10, 2018

Alan McCornick on Cardinal Marx, Cooperative Baptist Fellowship on LGBTQ Employees, Heated Debate About Progressive Evangelicals and LGBTQ Lives: News


I'd like to recommend today good commentary by my friend Alan McCornick about the story of Cardinal Marx and the case of the disappearing yes (aka, My God! No! We can't possibly bless you!).  Alan's commentary, entitled "The price of a blessing," is at his Hepzibah blog. Alan speaks German fluently and has an advantage many of us lack, when it comes to reading and summing up what the German media have been saying about this story.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

David Gushee's Still Christian: Following Jesus Out of American Evangelicalism on His Experience When He Spoke Out vs. Anti-LGBT Theologies


In his book Still Christian: Following Jesus Out of American Evangelicalism (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2017), David P. Gushee speaks about what happened as he began to revise his understanding of how the churches treat queer people — as he began to change his thinking as a religion scholar specializing in the field of ethics whose academic career was spent teaching in Baptist-affiliated institutions (Southern Baptist and Cooperative Baptist Fellowship). When he began to speak his mind and publish about these matters, he found himself slapped, excluded, shunned, disinvited from lecturing at places that had invited him to lecture, receiving hate mail, hate email, and hate tweets. He found his books yanked from shelves in Christian bookstores. Here (and above) are some excerpts for you (clicking graphics makes them enlarge):

Friday, June 17, 2016

Garrard Conley's Boy Erased: Template for Understanding Religion-Based Homophobia and Its Assault on Queer Humanity



I mentioned a few days back that I was reading Garrard Conley's book, Boy Erased (NY: Riverhead, 2016), which recounts his experiences growing up as the son of a Missionary Baptist minister in small-town Arkansas in the final decades of the 20th century and the start of the 21st century. As my previous reference to the book notes, it's primarily a memoir of his experiences at the "ex-gay" reparative therapy outfit Love in Action in Memphis, to which his parents sent him after he was outed to them as gay. Mama vomited on hearing this news, Papa threatened, and Conley had no choice except to go to LIA, if he expected his father to continue to claim him as a son and to help pay for his college education (he was in college when this happened).

Monday, June 9, 2014

Further Updates, Same-Sex Marriage in Arkansas: Democrat-Gazette Publishes Rejoinder to Jason Rapert, and On Marrying Where We Live



Last week, I expressed doubt about whether my state's newspaper of record, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, would publish Judge Wendell Griffen's rejoinder to an anti-marriage equality article written by state senator (and Baptist pastor) Jason Rapert, who is leading the crusade to have the state Supreme Court once again outlaw same-sex marriage in Arkansas. As my posting noted, Judge Griffen is also a pastor — of New Millennium Baptist Church in Little Rock — and is the minister who married Steve and me (and other same-sex couples) on May 12.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Candace Chellew-Hodge on David Gushee's Welcome of Gays to Churches: When Welcome Doesn't Mean Welcome

I wrote yesterday about Mitchell Gold and Mindy Drucker’s important anthology of first-hand testimonies re: growing up gay in churched America, Crisis: 40 Stories Revealing the Personal, Social, and Religious Pain and Trauma of Growing Up Gay in America. My posting notes the Christian Century review of Crisis written by David Gushee.

As I noted, Gushee’s review is important, both because it’s in a widely circulated mainstream religious publication, and because Gusheee is professor of Christian Ethics at Mercer, a Baptist university in Georgia, and is an ordained Baptist minister. I found Gushee’s conclusion encouraging: he concludes that the churches must repent of their anti-Christian crusade against gay persons, and ask forgiveness from gays and lesbians.

Today, I’d like to take note of an equally important critique of Gushee’s position by Candace Chellew-Hodge at Religion Dispatches. As I do, Chellew-Hodge applauds Gushee’s “impressive and impassioned plea for Christians to ask for forgiveness from the gay and lesbian community.”

Chellew-Hodge notes, however, that Gushee published an opinion piece about the place of gays and lesbians in the church last year in the Associated Baptist Press, in which he proposes “that accepting gay and lesbian people into the full realm of the church would mark a certain cultural surrender of the church's true beliefs . . . .” In Gushee’s view, “A church that is in the process of abandoning basic tenets of Christian sexual morality has no credibility as a moral voice in culture.”

Gushee’s Christian welcome of LGBT persons comes with a big price tag—for those who are gay, that is, exclusively for those who happen to be gay. As Chellew-Hodge notes, Gushee maintains that “[t]o be accepted, we have to be viewed as morally ‘less than’ our heterosexual counterparts who have achieved God's ‘gold standard’ of marriage.” Chellew-Hodge concludes that Gushee’s understanding of how gays and lesbians are to be welcomed by churches “only perpetuates the mistreatment of the community he decries in his [Christian Century] review.”

Candace Chellew-Hodge is absolutely right. In “welcoming” gays and lesbians to Christian communities, Gushee is articulating (in his ABP op-ed piece, at least) a position that makes gay and lesbian church members second-class citizens: in the very act of “welcoming” gays and lesbians, churches continue the stigmatization that their Christian welcome should seek to overcome, if it is genuine.

It is interesting that Gushee hangs the church’s entire encounter with culture on the question of how gays and lesbians are to be fit into God’s plan and church life. If I am not mistaken, there are many signs of the brokenness of creation running all through church life. Gays and lesbians alone hardly comprise the entire story of sin in the world.

All the churches with which I am acquainted contain ample numbers of straight folks living together without benefit of marriage, of divorced and remarried folks, and so forth. I daresay not a few Christian communities today welcome, and even turn a blind eye to the moral failings of, an adulterer here or there.

I can’t think of any church with which I’m acquainted that asks bankers charging usorious interest rates to repent of their heinous sins, before the church welcomes them. In fact, most churches I know welcome bankers with open arms, despite James’s injunction to give the best seats in the church to the poor rather than the wealthy (James 2:2-3). Militarists? Makers of weapons and those who use them to target innocent people in unjust wars? Those who benefit economically from the production of weapons used to kill innocent people? Racists and sexists?

All the churches I know are pretty much silent about those folks, when it comes to welcoming people into the Christian communion and asking them to repent of their sins, because their sins break the communion of the body of Christ and undermine the church’s effectiveness as it calls the culture to hear the gospel.

Somehow, gays and lesbians have ended up today being the sinner, the unique embodiment of all sin, whose welcome is problematic. Gays and lesbians are, for the churches today, the sinner on whose sin everything hinges. Let those folks inside—let them in without demeaning them, putting them in their place, and asking of them what you ask of no one else—and everything will fall apart.

The church will find itself unable to call the culture to accountability if it welcomes gays and lesbians without asking them to repent and then repent again—to observe standards of sexual propriety demanded of no other members of the church.

Something is very wrong with this argument about the churches, the obligation to live countercultural lives, and the problem of gays and lesbians. As I’ve noted in my critique of the similar argument of some United Methodist clergy who also maintain that the church can “welcome” gays and lesbians while singling them out as uniquely sinful and very problematic human beings, the argument that the church caves in to culture by accepting gays and lesbians spectacularly overlooks the manifold ways in which the church’s stance towards gays and lesbians is part and parcel of the very culture that needs to be called to transformation through the gospel.

In singling out gays and lesbians as unique icons of sexual sinfulness, while remaining totally silent about straight people living together without benefit of marriage, or adulterers, or those who are divorced and remarried, the churches simply mirror social standards. Churches long ago learned not to make an example of heterosexual people straying from strict Christian moral norms, just as the culture at large tends to eschew moralizing condemnation of those violating strict faith-based moral norms for heterosexual behavior.

And the church is wise in minding its business here: the business of the church is to preach the gospel, to offer the gospel to all, and then to leave judgment to God. While the churches can and should certainly point to moral standards they expect all members to strive towards, it is probably not pastorally helpful (or even fully Christian) for churches to point the finger at particular people and particular groups of people, to make those particular people and their lives a unique problem for churches as they welcome sinners.

(And when one thinks of how the churches almost never point the finger at the real sinners, those who oppress the poor, deprive families of bread, ignore widows and orphans, and gladly go to war, while the churches chastise a handful of sexual sinners, one begins to wonder even more about the lack of wisdom in many churches’ current anti-gay pastoral strategy . . . .)

Welcome means welcome. It does not mean welcome, but—one doesn’t qualify a welcome if one really intends to welcome. People are either welcome or not.

Identifying an entire group of human beings as a problem to be solved rather than as one among many groups of God’s children seeking the divine embrace does not constitute welcome, but continued condemnation—condemnation that keeps the doors of the churches tight shut against LGBT people, while affording Christians the smug satisfaction of having offered “welcome” to some poor sinners who, unfortunately, did not avail themselves of the offer of welcome.

If the churches expect to be believed when they preach the gospel to culture, they have to set—for their own lives and practice—a standard higher than that of the culture, not one that simply mimics cultural practice at its least admirable. Otherwise, those seeking role models for the life of virtue will turn elsewhere, to individuals and groups within the culture that model a really transformative ethic, a way of living that is authentically redemptive.

That transformative and redemptive model is just not to be found in many churches today, not when gays and lesbians come knocking at the door. And it won’t be in evidence until the churches stop singling out LGBT human beings as a uniquely problematic, uniquely sinful group of human beings, and start listening to our stories and greeting us as human beings—and recognizing that those stigmatized as particularly noisome wrongdoers sometimes bring the most powerful gifts to the community that has cast them out.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

If Today You Hear: Epiphanies and the Everyday

In the pilgrimage that is life, the lessons we most need to hear at any give time are right there around us, if we but have ears to hear them. Each day, when I pray Psalm 95, remembering as I do so that the whole church (in many liturgical traditions, at least) prays that psalm with me to begin the day, I mull over the line which says, "If today you hear my voice, harden not your heart."

Sometimes the line strikes me as unnecessarily accusatory: who would refuse to listen, if You would only really speak to us? Isn't the problem with You and Your silence, not with us?

At other times, the admonition to listen makes me think of the ways in which God actually does speak to us all the time. And we fail to hear. Our ears just aren't attuned, many times. We want the voice to be a booming proclamatory one on the mountaintop, not the still, small voice of a little girl that Elijah heard in the cave.

We want God to bowl us over, not to be right there in the mundane, in the bread and wine, the water and oil, the muck and manure of daily life. In the friends who are faithful and the friends who betray us. In the flawed brother and sister who kneels beside us at the communion rail. Our ability to hear is thwarted, because we have installed screening devices in our lives that dictate how God is to speak, and who God is to be.

As I think of all this today, two recent tiny epiphanies come to mind. These didn't leap into my life from some high place. It wasn't an authority figure or a teacher who planted the epiphanic seeds in my heart, seeds that have sprouted only slowly in the last several days, as I listen for God's voice while brewing a pot of tea or trimming gardenias, hydrangeas, and chaste tree blooms to put into the vase for Sunday dinner.

As with most of the epiphanies that get under our skin subtly and shift our worldview decisively, these came from people right around me, from family. The first occurred in a conversation with my aunt several weeks ago.

My aunt is 80. When Steve's brother Joe recently said, with understated sarcasm, "She's just a sweet little old lady," we all laughed uproariously. Little she is, old she is, but she is far more pith and vinegar than honey. And even she wouldn't bat an eyelash in telling you that.

So. As we often do when we talk, she told me of her latest trials and tribulations with nature. The natural world is my aunt's sworn enemy. It's out to get her. Birds manage, somehow, to mess on her bathroom window--which is perpendicular, not a surface on which a bird can perch.

Cats leave tokens in her yard. No sooner does she have the yard raked, than the magnolia leaves of the neighbors across the street insinuate themselves into her yard.

Her latest battle with nature is a futile attempt to synchronize the date her yard is mowed (it's never set, but depends on the need for mowing after rain or the passing of time) with the mowing of the yard next door. Problem is, that yard never gets mowed--or so my aunt claims.

It did get mowed routinely when the house was in the keeping of an elderly neighbor who lived in the house about fifty years. That neighbor was fastidious about her yard and garden. Even when she was so stooped with age that she could barely stand, we'd see her out fiddling beneath her azaleas and camellias, picking up spent leaves, tidying the mulch.

When she died a year or so ago, the house went to a nephew, who moved in with someone my aunt calls "his partner." Two men. Two young men. One of these promptly went off on military duty. The other does not mow the yard to my aunt's satisfaction. She's almost convinced that he deliberately lets it grow to defy her in her futile attempt to synchronize her lawn work with his.

Consequently, she often has a neat yard (until the magnolia leaves intrude, and God help us! the odious sweet-gum ball season is just around the corner now), while the yard next door is shabby. This drives my aunt crazy.

As she told me about this, speaking of the man who owns the house and his partner, I arched my eyebrows and said, "Partner? What do you mean by that?" I had suspected that the men were more than roommates. I suspected that she suspected, but we had never discussed it.

She said, "Well, aren't they together? That's what I mean. Nothing else." To which I replied, "Well, if you mean what I think you mean by 'together,' then you could always retaliate for the non-existent yard work by reporting the soldier to the army. Isn't it your patriotic and Christian duty to turn him in for importing his lifestyle into the military?"

I was, of course, teasing. When you live with pith and vinegar, you approach most subjects elliptically, since the reaction to anything you say can be unpredictably volatile.

My aunt's response: "I have enough business to take care of in my life without trying to mind someone else's business."

This from a devout church-going woman. From a Baptist. Well, from a Baptist whose church has left the Southern Baptist Convention because of its narrow-mindedness, and has affiliated with the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship. A church that sponsors a food pantry, in which my aunt works every week.

Nonetheless, a heartland Christian from a church regarded by most of us as less than progressive on gay issues: my aunt could not give a flip about how other people conduct their sexual lives. And she is not about to get involved in judging.

She has enough business of her own to manage, thank you very much.

I propose that this is the authentic Christian approach to gay people and gay issues. This is what I mean in yesterday's posting, when I talk about how it is not going to be church leaders and leaders of church-affiliated institutions that break down the barriers for gay people. Those folks are hopelessly enmeshed in power and toxic systems of lies.

It's going to be "ordinary" Christians like my aunt who change things. By refusing to judge. By refusing to hate. By continuing to love the gay people they already know and love--even when we don't mow our yards to her satisfaction.

(And for the other epiphany, I will keep you waiting . . . .)